Will the USA and European Union Stand Together in Solidarity with Ukraine???
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
Saturday, March 15, 2014
Comment du Jour
Ukraine's Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk
Ukraine’s Dangerous
Dependency on Russian Energy…and goodwill
UNITED NATIONS—A dangerous and deteriorating diplomatic
showdown continues over Ukraine as the United States and European Union
rhetorically push back against Vladimir
Putin’s power grab in the Crimea. In an
emergency Security Council meeting, Ukraine’s embattled Prime Minister Arseniy
Yatsenyuk made an impassioned plea for his country’s sovereign right “to remain
independent and free.”
Ukraine’s fledgling government nonetheless, realizes both
its vulnerability to neighboring Russia’s political policies as well as its energy supplies.
Ukraine and Europe in general face a dangerous dependency on
Russian energy; especially the free and unhindered flow of natural gas to heat
its homes and power its factories.
Ukraine has already seen the chilling results of Moscow turning off the
gas tap on two occasions in 2006 and 2009.
There’s nothing like a big freeze to concentrate thoughts.
Back in 1981 America’s new President Ronald Reagan, warned
West Germany and the Europeans in general of the geopolitical dangers resulting
from a trans-Siberian pipeline then being built to swish cheap Russian energy
to Europe. I recall being in Germany and
hearing the pious rationalizations by both big business and politicians how the
“Americans are overreacting” and how Soviet energy exports were “all
business.”
A generation later, and after the fall of the Soviet Union, the political palaver in both Washington and
the European Union about Putin’s resurgent Russia, seems to overlook the glaring reality that Eastern and some West
European states, are overly dependent not only on the Russian natural gas
supply, but let’s add, the Kremlin’s callous use of energy as a political tool
to effect change.
In 2006, the Bush Administration sharply criticized Russia
for using energy supplies as a weapon to politically influence countries and
urged the Europeans to diversify energy
supply sources.
Without question Ukraine, as an integral part of the former
Soviet system and despite its sovereignty since 1991, is grafted into the
Russian energy grid. While not surprising, this is a cause for concern given the
current crisis. We may also add that the three Baltic states, Latvia, Estonia
and Lithuania, though now independent
from Moscow and thankfully members of NATO and the European Union are 100
percent dependent on Russian energy. Add
Finland an Sweden too, in the 100
percent club.
The Central European countries such as the Czech Republic,
Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland while free
of Moscow’s formal embrace, and also NATO and EU members, are highly dependent, may we add with a wry smile, on Russian
largesse?
Now to Europe’s core countries. Germany, without question Europe’s economic
powerhouse, depends on Russia for one third of its oil and gas needs. This
dependence has widened given Germany’s ongoing phase-out of nuclear power.
Importantly neither the United Kingdom nor the Netherlands
have any significant Russian dependence given alternative sources from North
Sea and Norway.
Much of the current latter day wisdom coming out of
Washington points to growing natural gas production in the USA which can be
sold and shipped to Europe. This is a prudent medium term plan which sounds
reassuring on paper until you realize that building natural gas terminals to
ship the energy are mostly on the drawing boards.
Then there’s all the talk about new pipelines.
According to a Congressional Research Service report, “Europe’s Energy Security,”
“As Europe’s natural gas production has declined in recent
years, its dependence on imported natural gas has increased. This has left it
more dependent as a whole on its primary supplier, Russia, which has shown some
inclination to use its resources for political ends.”
The respected CRS adds, “All Russian natural gas exports are
controlled by Gazprom. As a state-controlled firm, Gazprom has the closest
possible links with top Russian leaders (Prime Minister Dimitri Mevedev served
as president of Gazprom). The personal and political fortunes of Russia’s
leaders are closely tied to Gazprom.”
Approximately half of
all Russian government revenue comes
from oil and gas.
The Kremlin is not going to shut off the lucrative tap to
Western Europe. Yet, as we have already witnessed, any interruptions to Ukraine
would cause supply problems downstream.
Remember many of the pipelines to Europe transit Ukraine.
Germany and Poland have been particularly scornful of
Moscow’s intimidation of Ukraine. Yet as
Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk candidly told Reuters, “Germany’s reliance
on Russian gas can effectively limit European sovereignty. “
Despite Europe’s distaste and unease with Moscow’s moves in
Crimea, and possibly beyond, sadly Europe’s diplomatic freedom of action is
compromised by its strong energy dependence on Russia. This is hardly coincidental.
Monday, March 3, 2014
Comment du Jour
The Crimean War
United Nations Meets on Ukraine Crisis
Less than a week after the spectacular closing ceremony of the Sochi Winter Olympics, the Russians violated the sovereignty of neighboring Ukraine. Taking advantage of Ukraine's civil and political unrest which had toppled the ruling pro-Russian regime in Kiev, allegedly causing anxiety among Russian ethnic minorities in parts of the vast land, President Vladimir Putin decided to settle the conflict the old fashioned way--with military intervention.
Russian forces, operating from pre- existing and legally sanctioned naval and air bases in Crimea, decided to expand their spheres of influence in the strategic southern peninsula. Crimea it is noted, has a majority ethnic Russian population.
A visibly shaken Ukrainian Ambassador to the UN briefed the Security Council and later correspondents to warn of the rapidly deteriorating situation in which he described illegal overflights of Ukrainian territory by Russian transport planes and attack helicopters as well as the seizure of Crimean airports by armed elements. He decried Russian aggression.
Ambassador Yuriy Sergeyev warned that the Russians may be trying to break off Crimean from Ukrainian sovereignty as Moscow did in the Georgia War in 2008 in which two "Russian ethnic" enclaves were seized from Georgia and set up as "independent republics." The Ambassador called for the international community to provide "moral and political support"to support the territorial integrity of Ukraine."
Ukraine which was part of the former Soviet Union, gained its independence in 1991 after the fall of the communist regime. In late 2013, the Ukrainian majority rallied in favor of closer economic integration with the European Union; the ruling pro-Russian regime tilted closer to Moscow, thus setting off the initial crisis.
The United States as well as key European allies such as France, Germany and Poland have attempted to broker a peaceful solution to the crisis before the Russian military intervention. The issue now becomes how to keep Moscow from advancing beyond the Crimea.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)