UN Assembly Rebuffs
Russia on Ukraine
In a resounding rebuff to Russia, the UN
General Assembly has reaffirmed Ukraine’s territorial integrity and has called
the recent referendum which incorporated the Crimean peninsula into Russia as
“invalid.” While President Vladimir Putin
signed a treaty joining Crimea with Russia, the Kiev government has committed
itself never to accept Crimea’s independence nor annexation.
Ukraine’s acting Foreign Minister Andrii Deshchytsia told
assembled delegates
“many still struggle to grasp the reality; it happened in Ukraine, in the very heart of
Europe. It happened in the 21st
century.” He added, “After two weeks of
military occupation in integral part of Ukraine has been forcibly annexed by a
state that had previously committed itself to guarantee, the independence,
sovereignty and territorial integrity of my country.”
The resolution was passed by a powerful vote of 100
countries backing Ukraine including the USA, Canada, the European Union states,
and many countries throughout Asia and Latin America.
Russia was backed by eleven countries among
them Belarus, Cuba, Nicaragua, North Korea, Syria, Sudan, Venezuela and
Zimbabwe.
Significantly 58 states abstained including Argentina,
Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Iraq, Pakistan and
South Africa. China posed the most curious abstention.
More than a score of countries in the 193 member Assembly
did not participate at all including Bosnia-Herzegovina, Israel, Islamic
Republic of Iran, Morocco and Serbia. Indeed
many of these states face active or dormant territorial disputes.
The non-binding Assembly resolution stresses that the
referendum held in Crimea has no validity and calls on states to “desist and
refrain” from any actions aimed at the disruption of Ukraine’s
national unity “including any attempts to modify Ukraine’s borders
through the threat or use of force or other unlawful means.”
The Obama Administration, given its ambivalence towards
Central Europe and Russia until the recent crisis, has now compensated with
rhetorical barrages and threats of wider economic sanctions on Russia.
Since the Crimea crisis has begun to unfold, Vladimir Putin
has pledged Moscow’s support to ethnic
Russian communities throughout the
former Soviet Union in places ranging from the Baltic states to Georgia and
Moldova. The Kremlin’s later day irredentism
recalls a bygone era in which seemingly “threatened” ethnic
communities were cause for intervention
by powerful neighbors.
“The European Union firmly believes that there is no place
for the use of force and coercion to change borders in Europe or elsewhere in
the 21st century, “ added EU Ambassador Thomas Mayr-Harting.
Though diplomacy appears to be keeping Moscow on the
defensive, it’s the threat of serious economic sanctions and ostracism from
global trade that may turn the tide.
So will Moscow’s hyper nationalism cause an economic
backlash against Russia?
And as significantly after Crimea, will Putin pause before
his next move?
No comments:
Post a Comment